Standard BMI Calculator
General BMI calculator for all adults.
Calculate your ideal body weight using four established clinical formulas. Each formula provides a slightly different estimate, so we average them for a more balanced result. Ideal weight calculators are among the most popular health tools alongside BMI calculators and body composition tools, because they translate your height into a concrete weight target rather than an abstract index number. For a comprehensive guide, see our article on how ideal weight calculators work.
Medical Disclaimer: These formulas provide estimates based on height and sex. "Ideal weight" is a clinical concept, not a universal standard. Individual health depends on many factors beyond weight. Always consult a healthcare professional. For more context, read our guides on BMI limitations and ideal weight calculation methods.
The table below shows ideal weight ranges for both men and women at various heights. The ranges account for body frame size (small, medium, and large) and represent the averaged output of the Devine, Robinson, Miller, and Hamwi formulas. These numbers serve as general guidelines -- your personal healthy weight may differ based on muscle mass, bone density, and overall body composition.
| Height | Small Frame | Medium Frame | Large Frame |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4'10" (147 cm) | 88 - 95 lbs | 95 - 105 lbs | 105 - 116 lbs |
| 4'11" (150 cm) | 90 - 97 lbs | 97 - 108 lbs | 108 - 119 lbs |
| 5'0" (152 cm) | 92 - 100 lbs | 100 - 110 lbs | 110 - 121 lbs |
| 5'1" (155 cm) | 95 - 103 lbs | 103 - 113 lbs | 113 - 124 lbs |
| 5'2" (157 cm) | 97 - 106 lbs | 106 - 116 lbs | 116 - 128 lbs |
| 5'3" (160 cm) | 100 - 109 lbs | 109 - 119 lbs | 119 - 131 lbs |
| 5'4" (163 cm) | 103 - 112 lbs | 112 - 123 lbs | 123 - 135 lbs |
| 5'5" (165 cm) | 106 - 115 lbs | 115 - 126 lbs | 126 - 139 lbs |
| 5'6" (168 cm) | 109 - 118 lbs | 118 - 130 lbs | 130 - 143 lbs |
| 5'7" (170 cm) | 112 - 121 lbs | 121 - 134 lbs | 134 - 147 lbs |
| 5'8" (173 cm) | 115 - 125 lbs | 125 - 137 lbs | 137 - 151 lbs |
| 5'9" (175 cm) | 118 - 128 lbs | 128 - 141 lbs | 141 - 155 lbs |
| 5'10" (178 cm) | 121 - 131 lbs | 131 - 145 lbs | 145 - 159 lbs |
| 5'11" (180 cm) | 124 - 135 lbs | 135 - 148 lbs | 148 - 163 lbs |
| 6'0" (183 cm) | 127 - 138 lbs | 138 - 152 lbs | 152 - 167 lbs |
| Height | Small Frame | Medium Frame | Large Frame |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5'2" (157 cm) | 116 - 124 lbs | 124 - 136 lbs | 136 - 150 lbs |
| 5'3" (160 cm) | 119 - 127 lbs | 127 - 140 lbs | 140 - 154 lbs |
| 5'4" (163 cm) | 122 - 131 lbs | 131 - 144 lbs | 144 - 158 lbs |
| 5'5" (165 cm) | 125 - 134 lbs | 134 - 148 lbs | 148 - 163 lbs |
| 5'6" (168 cm) | 128 - 138 lbs | 138 - 152 lbs | 152 - 167 lbs |
| 5'7" (170 cm) | 131 - 142 lbs | 142 - 156 lbs | 156 - 172 lbs |
| 5'8" (173 cm) | 134 - 145 lbs | 145 - 160 lbs | 160 - 176 lbs |
| 5'9" (175 cm) | 137 - 149 lbs | 149 - 164 lbs | 164 - 180 lbs |
| 5'10" (178 cm) | 140 - 153 lbs | 153 - 168 lbs | 168 - 185 lbs |
| 5'11" (180 cm) | 144 - 156 lbs | 156 - 172 lbs | 172 - 189 lbs |
| 6'0" (183 cm) | 147 - 160 lbs | 160 - 176 lbs | 176 - 194 lbs |
| 6'1" (185 cm) | 150 - 164 lbs | 164 - 180 lbs | 180 - 198 lbs |
| 6'2" (188 cm) | 153 - 167 lbs | 167 - 184 lbs | 184 - 202 lbs |
| 6'3" (191 cm) | 157 - 171 lbs | 171 - 188 lbs | 188 - 207 lbs |
| 6'4" (193 cm) | 160 - 174 lbs | 174 - 192 lbs | 192 - 211 lbs |
Note: These ranges are approximations derived from averaged formula outputs adjusted for frame size. For personalized results, use the calculator above. You can also check your result against our BMI calculator or BMI chart for women / BMI chart for men.
Our calculator uses four well-established clinical formulas. Each was developed in a different decade, by different researchers, for slightly different purposes. Understanding where they come from helps you interpret the results. For a broader look at how weight-related formulas work, see our BMI formula guide.
The most widely used ideal body weight formula in clinical practice. Dr. B.J. Devine originally published this formula to calculate drug dosages -- specifically aminoglycoside antibiotics -- where dosing needed to be based on lean body weight rather than total weight. Despite its pharmaceutical origins, it became the de facto standard for ideal body weight estimation.
The formula uses 60 inches (5'0") as the baseline, adding 2.3 kg for every inch of height above that baseline. Note that this means it cannot calculate ideal weight for people shorter than 5'0".
Dr. J.D. Robinson and colleagues published this formula in 1983 as a revised estimate of ideal body weight, attempting to correct some of the perceived overestimation in the Devine formula, especially for women. It uses a slightly lower per-inch increment for women.
The Robinson formula starts men at a slightly higher baseline (52 kg vs 50 kg) but increases more slowly per inch (1.9 vs 2.3). For women, the baseline is notably higher (49 kg vs 45.5 kg) but the per-inch increase is much lower (1.7 vs 2.3).
Also published in 1983, Dr. D.R. Miller proposed this formula with a higher baseline weight and the lowest per-inch increment of all four formulas. This means the Miller formula tends to give the highest ideal weight for shorter individuals but converges with the others at greater heights.
With a baseline of 56.2 kg for men and 53.1 kg for women, the Miller formula gives the most "generous" ideal weight for people of average height. It was designed to reflect that many healthy people weigh more than Devine's estimates.
The oldest of the four formulas, developed by Dr. G.J. Hamwi. This formula was introduced as a quick rule-of-thumb for clinicians. It uses a straightforward pounds-based calculation and remains popular due to its simplicity. The Hamwi formula tends to give the widest spread between results for short versus tall people because of its relatively high per-inch increment.
The Hamwi formula shares the same baseline as the Devine formula for women (45.5 kg) but has a slightly lower per-inch increment (2.2 vs 2.3). For men, Hamwi starts lower (48 kg) but uses the highest per-inch value (2.7), so it gives the highest results for tall men.
The chart below compares the four formulas for a 5'10" (178 cm) man with a medium frame. Notice how each formula produces a slightly different "ideal" -- this is why averaging gives a more robust estimate. For personalized gender-specific insights, see our BMI guide for men or BMI guide for women.
Height in inches = 66. We calculate (66 - 60) = 6 inches above the baseline.
Average: 59.6 kg (131.4 lbs). The four formulas agree closely at this height, ranging from about 129 to 135 lbs. Compare this with the BMI calculator for women to see the healthy BMI range.
Height in inches = 70. We calculate (70 - 60) = 10 inches above the baseline.
Average: 72.3 kg (159.4 lbs). At this height, the formulas show more variation -- from 155 to 165 lbs. The Hamwi formula gives the highest result, while Miller gives the lowest. You can cross-check this with the BMI calculator for men.
Body frame refers to the size of your skeletal structure. People with larger frames naturally carry more bone and tissue mass, so their healthy weight is higher than someone of the same height with a smaller frame. Our calculator adjusts the formula results by approximately -10% for small frames and +10% for large frames. Understanding your frame is also important when interpreting BMI results, as noted in our article on BMI accuracy.
This is the simplest method. Measure the circumference of your wrist at the narrowest point (just below the wrist bone) with a flexible tape measure. Compare your measurement to the tables below.
| Women's Frame Size by Wrist Circumference | |
|---|---|
| Height under 5'2" | Small: < 5.5" | Medium: 5.5" - 5.75" | Large: > 5.75" |
| Height 5'2" to 5'5" | Small: < 6" | Medium: 6" - 6.25" | Large: > 6.25" |
| Height over 5'5" | Small: < 6.25" | Medium: 6.25" - 6.5" | Large: > 6.5" |
| Men's Frame Size by Wrist Circumference | |
|---|---|
| Height over 5'5" | Small: 5.5" - 6.5" | Medium: 6.5" - 7.5" | Large: > 7.5" |
A more precise method used in clinical settings. Extend your arm forward, bend the forearm upward at a 90-degree angle, and use a caliper or ruler to measure the widest point across your elbow joint. Compare to age- and sex-specific reference tables. Generally:
Once you know your frame size, the standard adjustment is:
For example, if your medium-frame ideal weight is 150 lbs, a small frame person of the same height would target about 135 lbs, while a large frame person would target about 165 lbs. Learn more about how body composition interacts with weight metrics in our body fat vs BMI guide.
This chart shows how frame size adjustments affect ideal weight for a 5'6" person. Understanding your lean body mass helps put these frame differences in context.
The difference between small and large frame ideal weights can exceed 25 lbs for the same height. This demonstrates why a single "ideal weight" number is overly simplistic. For a complete assessment, combine ideal weight with your BMI result and consider lean body mass measurements.
Many people use "ideal weight" and "healthy weight" interchangeably, but they represent different concepts. Understanding the distinction is crucial for setting realistic health goals. Our healthy BMI range guide explores this in more detail, and our BMI guide for women and BMI guide for men provide gender-specific context.
A 5'8" woman could have an ideal weight of about 137 lbs according to the averaged formulas. But the healthy BMI range for this height spans from approximately 122 to 164 lbs. That is a 42-pound window in which a person can be considered medically healthy. The single "ideal" number falls roughly in the middle of that range, but aiming for an exact number can lead to unnecessary frustration and unhealthy behaviors.
Neither approach accounts for lean body mass. An athlete with significant muscle could weigh well above their "ideal weight" while having excellent metabolic health. Conversely, a sedentary person at their exact "ideal weight" may still have concerning body fat levels. For a deeper exploration, read our article on muscle mass and BMI.
Bottom line: Use the ideal weight calculation as a general reference point, not a precise target. The healthy BMI range gives you more flexibility, and body composition measurements like lean body mass and waist-to-height ratio provide a more complete picture of your health.
The concept of an "ideal" body weight has evolved significantly over the past century. Understanding this history helps put the calculator results in context and reveals why no single formula should be treated as definitive truth. The broader history of weight assessment is covered in our BMI history guide.
The modern concept of ideal weight began with the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in the 1940s. MetLife analyzed mortality data from millions of policyholders and published "desirable weight" tables based on height and frame size. These tables defined the weight range associated with the lowest mortality risk. While groundbreaking for their time, they were based almost entirely on white, middle-class Americans who could afford life insurance, introducing significant demographic bias.
Dr. G.J. Hamwi published the first simplified formula as a quick clinical tool. Rather than requiring clinicians to look up tables, the Hamwi formula allowed a rapid mental calculation. It was never intended to be a precise assessment -- just a convenient rule-of-thumb for busy doctors. Despite its simplicity, it remained in widespread use for decades.
The Devine formula emerged from pharmacology, not weight management. Dr. B.J. Devine needed a way to calculate appropriate drug doses for patients, since many medications should be dosed based on lean body mass rather than total weight. The formula quickly spread beyond pharmacology and became the most cited ideal body weight equation in medical literature. Ironically, Devine himself never published validation data for the formula.
By the 1980s, researchers recognized that the Devine formula might not be the best estimate for all populations. Robinson et al. and Miller et al. independently published revised formulas in the same year, each attempting to better represent the relationship between height and ideal weight. The Robinson formula aimed to correct perceived biases in the Devine formula, while the Miller formula used a different mathematical approach that produced higher baseline weights.
Today, these formulas persist in clinical practice primarily due to inertia and convenience. Modern medicine increasingly favors BMI ranges, body composition analysis, and metabolic health markers over single-number ideal weight targets. Organizations like the NHS and Mayo Clinic recommend using multiple metrics rather than relying on any single measure.
While these formulas remain in widespread use, they have significant limitations that users should understand. Many of these issues parallel the limitations of BMI itself. For a deeper understanding of body composition, see our lean body mass calculator guide and learn about body fat percentage vs BMI.
These formulas were developed primarily from data on Caucasian populations in Western countries. They may not accurately reflect ideal weights for people of Asian, African, Hispanic, or other ethnic backgrounds, whose body composition and bone density patterns can differ significantly. Our BMI accuracy article discusses similar concerns.
None of the four formulas account for age, yet body composition changes substantially throughout life. Older adults naturally lose muscle mass and bone density, while younger adults may carry more lean mass. Our age-adjusted BMI calculator offers a more nuanced approach for different life stages.
The formulas treat all weight as equal, making no distinction between muscle, fat, bone, and water. A muscular athlete and a sedentary person of the same height and sex get the same "ideal weight." Use our lean body mass calculator for a composition-aware estimate. See also: BMI for athletes.
All four formulas use 5'0" (60 inches) as their baseline and are mathematically undefined or unreliable for heights below this. They also become less reliable at extreme heights. If you are very short or very tall, the formulas may not give useful results.
Surprisingly, most of these formulas were never validated against actual health outcomes. The Devine formula, the most widely used, was published without supporting data. They persist in practice due to convenience and tradition rather than proven accuracy.
Modern health assessment increasingly relies on body composition analysis (DEXA scans, bioelectrical impedance), waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, and metabolic health markers. These provide far more useful information about health risk than any height-based weight formula.
Each formula was developed by different researchers using different populations and methodologies. The Devine formula (1974) was originally created for drug dosing. The Robinson (1983) and Miller (1983) formulas were published as corrections to Devine's estimates. The Hamwi formula (1964) is the oldest and was designed as a quick clinical rule-of-thumb. They use different baseline weights and different per-inch increments, so the results diverge -- especially at heights far from the 5'0" baseline. Using the average of all four gives a more balanced, robust estimate. For a deeper look at formula differences, see our BMI formula guide.
Body frame refers to the size of your skeletal structure -- primarily the width and density of your bones. There are two common methods to estimate frame size. The wrist circumference method: measure your wrist at the narrowest point with a tape measure and compare to height-specific reference values (see the body frame section above). The elbow breadth method: extend your arm, bend at 90 degrees, and measure the distance between the two prominent bones of your elbow with a caliper. People with larger frames have wider bones and can naturally carry more weight, so the ideal weight for a large frame is roughly 10% higher than for a medium frame. Learn how frame and composition interact with weight metrics in our BMI vs body composition article.
No. "Ideal weight" formulas give a single target number based on height and sex, while "healthy weight" is a range typically defined by a BMI of 18.5 to 24.9. For a 5'8" person, this range spans about 40 pounds. You can be perfectly healthy at weights well above or below the formula-derived "ideal." The BMI healthy range, shown alongside the formula results in our calculator, gives you a broader, more realistic target. Neither approach accounts for body composition, muscle mass, or other individual factors. Read more in our healthy BMI range guide.
No single formula has been proven to be the most accurate. The Devine formula is the most widely used in clinical settings, but this is largely due to historical inertia rather than superior accuracy. Research by Pai and Paloucek (2000) compared the formulas and found that the Robinson formula tended to give results closest to the middle of the BMI healthy range for average-height individuals. The Miller formula tends to be most "generous," giving higher ideal weights. Our approach of averaging all four formulas provides a more robust estimate than relying on any single one. For the most accurate assessment of your healthy weight, combine these results with your BMI, lean body mass, and a doctor's evaluation.
The formulas themselves do not account for age, but in reality, your optimal weight does shift as you age. After age 30, adults typically lose about 3-5% of muscle mass per decade (a process called sarcopenia). Bone density also decreases, especially after menopause in women. Research suggests that being slightly above "ideal weight" in older age (BMI 25-27) may actually be protective, a phenomenon known as the "obesity paradox." Our BMI calculator by age and the guide on BMI by age provide age-adjusted context that the ideal weight formulas lack.
No. All four formulas were developed from data on predominantly Caucasian Western populations. Body composition varies significantly across ethnic groups. People of South Asian descent tend to have a higher body fat percentage at any given BMI, meaning a lower "ideal weight" might be more appropriate. People of Polynesian or African descent may have greater bone and muscle density, meaning a higher weight could be perfectly healthy. The World Health Organization has acknowledged that BMI cutoffs -- and by extension ideal weight targets -- may need to be adjusted for different populations. Read more about these considerations in our article on BMI limitations.
The calculated ideal weight should be treated as a general reference point, not a strict target. A more useful goal is to fall within the healthy BMI range (18.5 - 24.9) while maintaining good metabolic health markers (blood pressure, blood sugar, cholesterol). Focus on overall health behaviors -- regular physical activity, balanced nutrition, adequate sleep, and stress management -- rather than hitting an exact number on the scale. If you are concerned about your weight, consult a healthcare professional who can evaluate your individual situation, including body composition, medical history, and health goals. See our healthy weight tips for practical guidance.
If your current weight is significantly above or below the calculated ideal, don't panic. First, remember that these formulas have known limitations and may not apply to your body type. If you are muscular, the formulas will underestimate your healthy weight. Second, if you genuinely need to lose or gain weight, research shows that even modest changes of 5-10% of body weight can significantly improve metabolic health markers. Set incremental goals rather than fixating on the formula number. Work with a healthcare provider or registered dietitian to develop a safe, sustainable plan. For people significantly overweight, our articles on overweight BMI risks, how to lower BMI, and improving your BMI may be helpful starting points.
No. These formulas are designed for adults only. Children and teenagers are still growing, and their body composition changes rapidly. For people under 20, the appropriate tool is an age- and sex-specific growth chart using BMI percentiles. Our pediatric BMI calculator uses CDC growth charts to assess weight status for children ages 2-19. You can also read our detailed guide on BMI for children.
The ideal weight formulas and BMI both use height and weight, but in different ways. BMI is calculated from your actual weight and tells you which category you fall into (underweight, normal, overweight, obese). Ideal weight formulas work in reverse -- they use only your height to predict what you "should" weigh. The ideal weight from these formulas typically corresponds to a BMI of roughly 21-23, which is near the middle of the "normal" range. Our calculator shows both the formula results and the healthy BMI range so you can compare. For a full explanation of BMI categories, see our BMI categories guide.
For authoritative information on healthy weight, body mass index, and weight management, consult these reputable sources:
General BMI calculator for all adults.
BMI calculator with women-specific ranges.
BMI calculator with men-specific ranges.
Age-adjusted BMI recommendations.
BMI percentiles for children ages 2-19.
Estimate lean mass and body fat percentage.
In-depth guide covering all four clinical formulas and how to interpret results.
Everything you need to know about BMI calculation and interpretation.
Understanding what BMI can and cannot tell you about your health.
How body fat percentage compares to BMI as a health indicator.
Evidence-based strategies for reaching and maintaining a healthy weight.
How the Body Mass Index was developed and evolved over centuries.